[1]周中一,徐智凌,王涛,等.单檐庑殿古建筑模拟地震振动台试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2021,41(03):064-74.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2021.03.64.zhouzy.007]
 ZHOU Zhongyi,XU Zhiling,WANG Tao,et al.Shaking table test of single eaves hipped roof ancient building[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2021,41(03):064-74.[doi:10.13197/j.eeev.2021.03.64.zhouzy.007]
点击复制

单檐庑殿古建筑模拟地震振动台试验研究
分享到:

《地震工程与工程振动》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
41
期数:
2021年03
页码:
064-74
栏目:
论文
出版日期:
2021-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Shaking table test of single eaves hipped roof ancient building
作者:
周中一 徐智凌 王涛 滕睿 李海洋 周博威
中国地震局工程力学研究所, 地震工程与工程震动重点实验室, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080
Author(s):
ZHOU Zhongyi XU Zhiling WANG Tao TENG Rui LI Haiyang ZHOU Bowei
Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China
关键词:
单檐庑殿顶古建筑振动台试验研究
Keywords:
single eaveshipped roofancient buildingshaking table testexperimental study
分类号:
TU311P315.9
DOI:
10.13197/j.eeev.2021.03.64.zhouzy.007
摘要:
庑殿建筑作为最高等级的古建筑形式,多用于宫殿、坛庙、重要门楼等,为研究该类建筑的抗震性能,进行了1个1/2缩尺单檐庑殿顶古建筑模型模拟地震振动台试验,获得了不同输入地震动不同水准下单檐庑殿建筑的动力响应和破坏现象,总结了柱顶石、围护墙与木构架间的相互作用、榫卯结构的变形规律等。研究表明:柱底与柱顶石间相对滑移削弱了上部结构的地震响应,减震效果良好;输入地震动强度较大时,小额枋、额枋垫板榫头轻微拔出,大额枋榫头连接牢固,木构架的整体性良好;庑殿顶与木构架间通过斗拱连接,有一定的变形能力,在保证结构整体稳定性的同时,增强了结构的耗能能力,提高了该类建筑的整体抗震性能。
Abstract:
As the highest-class ancient buildings, the hipped roof buildings mostly used as palaces, temples and important gatehouse. To study the seismic performance of these type buildings, one 1 / 2 scale single eave hipped roof ancient building model has been tested by shaking table. Based on the shaking table test, the dynamic response and damage phenomenon of the model under different PGA (peak ground acceleration) were obtained, the interaction of the column top stone, infilled wall and timber structure were summarized, the deformation law of mortise and tenon structure was analyzed. The results show that the relative sliding between the column bottom and the column top stone can weaken the seismic response of the upper structure and improve the upper structure’s damping effect. When the input PGA (peak ground acceleration) is large, slight pulling-out deformation from the mortise-tenon and beam-to-column joints was observed which implied that the timber frame have good integrity due to strong connection between the primary architrave and the timber column. The dougong brackets which has good deformability can connect the hipped roof and the timber frame as one whole firmly, enhance the structure’ energy dissipation ability and improved seismic performance of the hipped roof ancient buildings.

参考文献/References:

[1] 马炳坚.中国古建筑木作营造技术[M].北京:科学出版社, 2017. MA Bingjian, Construction Technology of Chinese Historic Wood Buildings[M]. Beijing:The Science Publishing Company, 2017.(in Chinese)
[2] 朱蕾. 藏式古建筑木构架抗震性能分析[D].北京:北京交通大学, 2016. ZHU Lei. Study on the Seismic Performance of Ancient Tibetan Timber Structure[D]. Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University, 2016.(in Chinese)
[3] 周乾, 闫维明, 关宏志, 等. 古建嵌固墙体对木构架抗震性能的影响分析——以太和殿为例[J]. 四川大学学报(工程科学版), 2014, 46(1):81-86. ZHOU Qian,YAN Weiming, GUAN Hongzhi, et al. Influence of embedded walls to aseismic performances of timber structure of Chinese ancient timber buildings-taking taihe palace as example[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Engneering Science Edition),2014, 46(1):81-86.(in Chinese)
[4] 任忠文.中国古建木结构的整体抗震性能研究[D].天津:天津大学,2012. REN Zhongwei. Study on Monolithic Seismic Performance of Historical Timber Buildings[D].Tianjin:Tianjin University, 2012.(in Chinese)
[5] 姚侃, 赵鸿铁, 薛建阳, 等.古建木结构榫卯连接的扁钢加固试验[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2009, 41(10):220-224. YAO Kan,ZHAO Hongtie1, XUE Jianyang, et al. Experimental studies on seismic characteristic of strengthened mortise-tenon jointin historical timber buildings[J]. Journal of Habin Institute of Tecnolgy, 2009, 41(10):220-224.(in Chinese)
[6] 张鹏程.中国古代木构建筑结构及其抗震发展研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2003. ZHANG Pengcheng. Study on Structure and Its Seismic Behavior Development of Chinese Ancient Timber Structure Buildings[D]. Xi’an:Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 2003.(in Chinese)
[7] 薛建阳, 张鹏程, 赵鸿铁. 古建木结构抗震机理的探讨[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 32(1):8-11. XUE Jianyang, ZHANG Pengcheng, ZHAO Hontie. Study on the aseismic mechanism of historic timber structural building[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2000, 32(1):8-11.(in Chinese)
[8] 梁思成.清工部《工程做法则例》图解[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2006. LIANG Sicheng. Illustration of Code for Engineering Practice of Ministry of Work of Qing Dynasty[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2006. (in Chinese)
[9] 程万里, 马炳坚.清式木构建筑的节点和榫卯[J]. 建筑技术, 1981(3):58-64. CHENG Wanli, MA Binjian. Node and mortise and tenon of Qing style wood structure building[J]. Building technology, 1981(3):58-64.(in Chinese)

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-04-03;改回日期:2021-02-06。
基金项目:中国地震局专项业务费项目(2020EEEVL0406,CEA201919);黑龙江省博士后科研启动基金项目(LBH-Q15146)
作者简介:周中一(1980-),男,副研究员,博士,主要从事工程结构抗震研究.E-mail:zhouzy@iem.ac.cn
通讯作者:王涛(1977-),男,研究员,博士,主要从事工程结构抗震研究.E-mail:wangtao@iem.ac.cn.
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01