[1]吕杨,赵征,王建涛,等.墩底可抬升刚构桥模型振动台试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2022,42(02):071-77.[doi:10.13197/j.eeed.2022.0208]
 LV Yang,ZHAO Zheng,WANG Jiantao,et al.Shaking table tests of a rigid frame bridge with footing separation[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2022,42(02):071-77.[doi:10.13197/j.eeed.2022.0208]
点击复制

墩底可抬升刚构桥模型振动台试验研究
分享到:

《地震工程与工程振动》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
42
期数:
2022年02期
页码:
071-77
栏目:
论文
出版日期:
2022-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Shaking table tests of a rigid frame bridge with footing separation
作者:
吕杨1 赵征1 王建涛1 杨子奇2 陈宇3
1. 天津城建大学 天津市土木建筑结构防护与加固重点实验室, 天津 300384;
2. 新西兰奥克兰大学土木与环境工程学院, 奥克兰1142;
3. 中国民航大学 交通科学与工程学院, 天津 300300
Author(s):
LV Yang1 ZHAO Zheng1 WANG Jiantao1 YANG Ziqi2 CHEN Yu3
1. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Civil Structure Protection and Reinforcement, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China;
2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, the University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand;
3. School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
关键词:
振动台试验刚构桥单墩桥基底抬升
Keywords:
shaking table testrigid frame bridgesingle-column bridgefooting separation
分类号:
U448.23
DOI:
10.13197/j.eeed.2022.0208
摘要:
桥墩基础抬升可以切断地震动向上部结构传播,基础与地基碰撞还可以耗散地震能量,然而已有研究大多集中在数值模拟或理论分析,缺乏大型振动台试验验证。文中设计制作了一座基础固接和基础可抬升的连续刚构桥模型并进行振动台试验。对2种模型的动力特性、加速度响应和位移响应等进行对比分析。结果表明:基础可抬升桥梁较基础固接桥梁固有频率小;基础抬升将增大桥面梁位移、减小桥墩弯矩;地震激励的频率特性对桥梁结构地震响应影响显著。
Abstract:
Transient and partial separation of bridge footings from the support would reduce the transmitted seismic loading from the ground and cause re-contact impacts at the footing-support interface,thus dissipating energy from structures. However,most of the research has been done numerically or analytically. In the present study,a scaled down bridge was designed and built. This bridge can simulate two footing conditions,i.e. fixed and footing separation. Shaking table tests were carried out on the bridge of different footing conditions to examine the dynamic properties,acceleration and displacement responses. Results indicate that partial footing separation was prone to increase the displacement of the girder while reducing the bending moment in the pier. Also,the footing separations were more dominated by the frequency than the amplitude of excitations.

参考文献/References:

[1] HOUSNER G W. The Behavior of inverted pendulum structure during earthquakes[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,1963,53(2):403-417.
[2] ASLAM M,FODDEN W G,SCALISE D T. Earthquake rocking response of rigid bodies[J]. Journal of the Structural Division,1978,106(2):377-392.
[3] ANOOSHEHPOOR A,HEATON T H,SHI B,et al. Estimates of the ground accelerations at Point Reyes Station during the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,1999,89(4):845-853.
[4] ZHANG J,MAKRIS N. Rocking response of free-standing blocks under cycloidal pulses[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics,2001,127(5):473-483.
[5] LENCI S,REGA G. A dynamical systems approach to the overturning of rocking blocks[J]. Chaos,Solitons and Fractals,2006,28(2):527- 542.
[6] DIMITRAKOPOULOS E G,FUNG E D W. Closed-form rocking overturning conditions for a family of pulse ground motions[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A:Mathematical,Physical and Engineering Science,2016,472(2196):20160662.
[7] VOYAGAKI E,PSYCHARIS IN,MYLONAKIS G. Complex response of a rocking block to a full-cycle pulse[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics,2014,140(6):04014024.
[8] LV Yang,SUN Xiaoghui,LING Jing,et al. Rocking response of free-standing rigid blocks on slopes[J]. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics,2020,20(9):2050111.
[9] 郑越,陈兴冲. 考虑基础提离与塑性的桥墩地震反应[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2009,29(4):125-131. ZHENG Yue,CHEN Xingchong. Seismic response of double-column bridge piers considering uplift and yield of foundation[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics,2009,29(4):125-131.(in Chinese)
[10] 陈兴冲,郑越. 弹塑性Winkler地基上双柱式桥墩的地震反应[J]. 工程力学,2005,22(3):112-117. CHEN Xingchong,ZHENG Yue. Seismic response of double-column bridge piers on elasto-plastic Winkler foundation[J]. Engineering Mechanics,2005,112-117.(in Chinese)
[11] 夏修身,陈兴冲. 铁路高墩桥梁基底摇摆隔震与墩顶减震对比研究[J]. 铁道学报,2011,33(9):102-107. XIA Xiushen,CHEN Xingchong. Controlled rocking and pier top seismic isolation of railway bridge with tall piers[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society,2011,33(9):102-107.(in Chinese)
[12] HUNG H H,LIU K Y,HO T H,et al. An experimental study on the rocking response of bridge piers with spread footing foundations[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,2011,40(7):749-769.
[13] 杜修力,周雨龙,韩强,等. 摇摆桥墩的研究综述[J].地震工程与工程振动,2018,38(5):1-11. DU Xiuli,ZHOU Yulong,HAN Qiang,et al. Summary of research on swing pier[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics,2018,38(5):1-11.(in Chinese)
[14] 郝朝伟,陈彦江,闫维明,等. 基底摇摆隔震在双肢薄壁高墩刚构桥中的应用[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造,2017,39(1):104-111. HAO Chaowei,CHEN Yanjiang,YAN Weiming,et al. The application of controlled rocking isolation in the continuous rigid frame bridge with double limb thin-wall high piers[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting,2017,39(1):104-111.(in Chinese)
[15] 邱文亮,姜萌,张哲.城市独柱墩桥梁结构体系非线性抗震研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2010,30(1):161-166. QIU Wenliang,JIANG Meng,ZHANG Zhe. Research on nonlinear seismic resistance of urban single-pier pier bridge structure system[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics,2010,30(1):161-166.(in Chinese)
[16] QIN X,CHEN Y,CHOUW N. Effect of uplift and soil nonlinearity on plastic hinge development and induced vibrations in structures[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering,2013,16(1):135-147.
[17] CHEN Y,KUN C,LARKIN T,et al. Impact of vertical ground excitation on a bridge with footing uplift[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2016,20(7):1035-1053.
[18] CHEN Y,LARKIN T,CHOUW N. Experimental assessment of contact forces on a rigid base following footing uplift[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2017,46(11):1835-1854.

相似文献/References:

[1]王满生,杨威,陈俞,等.北京地区农村砖木结构振动台试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2012,32(01):128.
 WANG Mansheng,YANG Wei,CHEN Yu,et al.Shaking table test on a typical brick-timber structure model in rural areas of Beijing[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2012,32(02):128.
[2]刘汉香,许强,范宣梅.地震动参数对斜坡加速度动力响应规律的影响[J].地震工程与工程振动,2012,32(02):041.
 LIU Hanxiang,XU Qiang,FAN Xuanmei.Effects of seismic parameters on acceleration responses of slopes[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2012,32(02):041.
[3]曹万林,周中一,董宏英,等.带竖向构造钢筋再生混凝土砖结构振动台试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2012,32(04):111.
 CAO Wanlin,ZHOU Zhongyi,DONG Hongying,et al.Shaking table test study on recycled aggregate concrete brick structure with vertical constructional reinforcements[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2012,32(02):111.
[4]郭迅,王玉梅,何福.典型高墩大跨混凝土刚构桥模态参数测试[J].地震工程与工程振动,2012,32(05):089.
 GUO Xun,WANG Yumei,HE Fu.Modal parameters identification of a typical reinforced concrete rigid frame bridge with super high piers and long spans[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2012,32(02):089.
[5]谢强,白杰,薛松涛,等.特高压输电线路塔线耦联体系非线性振动响应振动台试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2012,32(05):103.
 XIE Qiang,BAI Jie,XUE Songtao,et al.Shaking table test on nonlinear vibration responses of UHV transmission tower-line coupling system[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2012,32(02):103.
[6]韩建平,李达文,王飞行.基于Hilbert-Huang变换和随机子空间识别的模态参数识别[J].地震工程与工程振动,2010,30(01):054.
 HAN Jianping,LI Dawen,WANG Feixing.Modal parameter identification based on Hilbert-Huang transform and stochastic subspace identification[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2010,30(02):054.
[7]孟焕陵,黄维纲.新型混合结构体系在超高层建筑的应用研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2010,30(01):069.
 MENG Huanling,HUANG Weigang.Application research on new hybrid structure systems in super-tall buildings[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2010,30(02):069.
[8]杨树标,马裕超,李旭光,等.复合隔震结构模型振动台试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2010,30(01):142.
 YANG Shubiao,MA Yuchao,LI Xuguang,et al.Study on shaking table test model for composite isolation structures[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2010,30(02):142.
[9]唐亮,凌贤长,徐鹏举,等.承台型式对可液化场地桥梁桩-柱墩地震响应影响振动台试验[J].地震工程与工程振动,2010,30(01):155.
 TANG Liang,LING Xianzhang,XU Pengju,et al.Effect of cap type on seismic responses of bridge pile-column pier in liquefiable ground by shaking table test[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2010,30(02):155.
[10]陈隽,史晓军,李杰.非一致地震激励地下综合管廊振动台模型试验研究(Ⅱ)——试验结果[J].地震工程与工程振动,2010,30(02):123.
 CHEN Jun,SHI Xiaojun,LI Jie.Shaking table test of utility tunnel under non-uniform seismic excitations(Ⅱ):Experimental results[J].EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING DYNAMICS,2010,30(02):123.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-5-9;改回日期:2021-8-30。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(52178295,51808270)
作者简介:吕杨(1984-),男,教授,博士,主要从事结构抗震研究.E-mail:lvyangtju@163.com
通讯作者:陈宇(1987-),男,讲师,博士,主要从事桥梁结构抗震研究.E-mail:tjucy@tju.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01